Sunday, March 18, 2012

No, I do not "Want to become a 99% trainer?"

An email with the following text was delivered to me that other day:
Dear MoveOn member,

Inspired by the everyday heroes of Occupy Wall Street, this spring people everywhere are getting ready for a surge of action to confront the 1%.

To prepare, dozens of groups from across the progressive movement are starting with an unprecedented and ambitious goal for the 99% Spring: to train 100,000 people in nonviolent direct action, in the spirit of Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., and Rosa Parks.
I say no.

There was a time I had some hopes that moveon.org might prove an effective advocate for policies I support, that it would use its resources to effectively support ideas and candidates with policies I share, and most importantly, actually spend time educating and building a constituency for these ideas.

Say what you like about the reactionaries, they have spent the last 30 years do these things. They have
  • Used mass media to explain their theories, and why they are better.
  • Popularized goals and objects and made them part of the political discussion through poltical organizing and outreach.
  • Created a cadre of individuals who are willing to take on public office at all levels of govenment to implement their policies.
  • Created a core group of constituencies who are loyal to their cause -- even against their own interested.
Let us put that another way, they have play practical electoral politics effectively.  In the course of this they have created a separate reactionary nationalism, which while at odds with the views of many, has no counter balance.

Now moveon.org wants me to devote resources to 'confront the 1%'.  One can only assume they mean more 'grassroots organizing',  'consensus planning', and  'occupation'. That is to say more feel good politics.

We need to organize and motivate large numbers of people, get them to the polls, provide them with candidates who not only support our goals but have an understanding of how to do that.

Whatever their spirit, Gandhi, King, and Parks were also savvy operators.  They built coalitions, created defining symbols and messages, used media, and changed the behaviors of large numbers of people.


In a recent break of the tradition of preaching to the choir, moveon.org actually made a half way decent add designed to create a wedge with GOP voters.  Now,it needs to create adds explaining why taxing the rich is a good job creation strategy, why anti-union laws depress all wages and kill jobs, and I could go on and on.

They point is to sell our ideas clearly and simply -- which is doable with out deceit  -- and use our resources to counter the strength of the reactionaries.

The first obligation of a political movement is to obtain power.  Nothing else matters if that is not obtained.

Spend money where it will work, punish political figures who have betrayed us, make the movement into a base.

But no, moveon.org wants protest leaders.  There is a simple reason why Republican fear their base, and Democrats have contempt for their.

1 comments:

Matthew Saroff said...

Some points here:
* MoveOn is lame. It's intellectually masturbatory in nature, as evidenced by the Petreaus/Betray Us crap, and all but one of the web ads that I’ve seen have been cringeworthy (Revenge of the Frist, please). Why you are on their mailing list for those Trustafarian idiots is beyond me.

* I know that this sounds earthy crunchy, but the Occupy movement has changed the debate, with (some) people among the pundits (rightly) now questioning the "Washington Consensus". (Rubinomics. BTW, Bob Rubin should be in jail)

* I think that you miss the position of at least some of those in Occupy. Without sounding too melodramatic, many of those in the movement see the movement as an anti-colonial or anti-dictatorship movement, in the vein of actions against the British rulers in India in the early to mid 1900s, or the actions against the Mubarak government in Egypt recently. From this perspective, any action that involves electoral efforts is bound to fail, since the levers of power are elsewhere.

I disagree with the 3rd bullet point, I don’t think that we are under colonial occupation from Wall Street, despite the best efforts of Obama and Geithner, though I think that we are closer to this than we would like.

I will also note that there have been real successes from Occupy, most notably forcing real negotiations between various anti-union port operators and the unions on the west coast.

Still, it would be nice if Occupy got their shit together, and went al "Club for Growth" on Blue Dogs.

Post a Comment