Thursday, February 27, 2014
Just when you thought....
...that there was not more parental guilt to be had...
Older Dads More Likely to Have Kids with Mental Illnesses.
Monday, February 24, 2014
You have to laugh...
when you read about someone with no sense of irony.
From Huffington Post
But as RonCo would say, there's more:
From Huffington Post
Even Burkman concedes that conservatives like himself are supposed to
find it abhorrent when the government tells a private business how to
conduct its affairs.
"However," he added, "there are times when
that is trumped for reason of great urgency or necessity. And I think
this is it, because I see the society sliding in the wrong direction."
"II don't suppose looking at the health and safety of football players would constitute a moral issue.
felt that if the NFL doesn't have any morals, and people like
[Commissioner] Roger Goodell, who are just go-along-get-along guys, just
want to appease advertisers, appease corporate America and all that
stuff," he said, "I figured, well, it is time for conservatives in
Congress to step in and define morality for them."
But as RonCo would say, there's more:
He is also not necessarily the best person to wage a fight over decency and morality. A few years back, his name was reportedly found on the D.C. madam's list of clients of high-end prostitutes.
"The story simply was false," he said. "I'll say what I said on the air at the time. It is simply a false story. The numbers listed were never mine. It was planted by somebody in the liberal blog world."
"My life has been far from perfect. I am hardly any type of embodiment of moral perfection," he added. "But I have never let that stop me from doing what I think is right for the nation."Good to know he will protect me.
Tuesday, February 11, 2014
Bias Bash: Why the media fixates on Hillary Clinton's past | Fox News Video
Bias Bash: Why the media fixates on Hillary Clinton's past | Fox News Video
This is a fascinating example of indirect attack. The question asked is why the information was public.
That's right, it is terribly suspicious that the information was public. To follow this out, Fox will only trust Clinton if she keeps secret. And the media failed its job by not asking, why isn't this secret.
To be fair and balanced, this is a gem of its type.
This is a fascinating example of indirect attack. The question asked is why the information was public.
That's right, it is terribly suspicious that the information was public. To follow this out, Fox will only trust Clinton if she keeps secret. And the media failed its job by not asking, why isn't this secret.
To be fair and balanced, this is a gem of its type.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)